In a recent governance discussion, @swiftstaking introduced a proposal titled “Extend the Score Management Committee and Request Additional Funding.” This draft outlines plans to expand the Score Management Committee by adding two new members—@swiftstaking and @kamikazechaser—and securing additional funding to compensate them for their contributions.
The committee, originally established as part of the Great Celo Halvening Parameters proposal, manages score tracing for validators’ community RPCs. Following the hard fork, the committee began operating in its expanded form. This proposal aims to retroactively align governance structures and funding with these operational changes.
Key Aspects of the Proposal
Formalizing Committee Expansion
Retroactive inclusion of new members in the committee.
Updates to governance records to reflect the expanded structure.
Additional Funding Request
A request for 24,000 cUSD to compensate the new members through the existing multisig wallet.
Proposed Transactions
Funding Allocation: Transfer 24K cUSD to the committee’s multisig wallet for retroactive compensation.
Multisig Update: Include the new members’ addresses in the multisig wallet configuration.
Rationale
The proposal underscores the importance of aligning governance with operational realities. The expanded committee has already been working post-hard fork to ensure ecosystem continuity. Formalizing these changes ensures fairness and transparency while addressing funding needs.
Risks and Verification
Governance Misalignment: The retroactive approach resolves discrepancies between governance records and actual operations.
Budget Impact: The funding request is consistent with the compensation rates of existing committee members.
Community members can verify this proposal by reviewing the original Great Celo Halvening Parameters proposalÂ
For more details, you can read the discussion in the Celo governance forum here.
Â
Post Comment